On Sep 11, 2013 10:04 AM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote: > > On 11/09/2013 15:56 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I like the idea, but matches has been in release builds for a long time, >>> right? Hitch uses it. >> >> >> <!DOCTYPE html>.<script>w("matches" in document.body)</script> >> http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ >> >> false in both Firefox and Chrome. > > > See http://caniuse.com/#search=matches. You do get mozMatchesSelector (and variants) in there. > > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon Yes, to be clear, that is what i meant. If it is in a draft and widely/compatibly implemented and deployed in released browsers not behind a flag - people are using it. That's part of why we switched the general philosophy right? No doubt one can be a shorthand for the better approach though...right?Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:50:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC