- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:41:16 +0200
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 06:42:07 UTC
Why are there two definitions for shapes? The <shape> value defined in CSS 2.1[1] (and used for the clip property) and the <basic-shape> value defined in the CSS Shapes Module[2]. Furthermore they both contain different syntaxes for describing rectangular shapes, i.e. rect() and rectangle(). Shouldn't both be merged into one definition? Or the definition in the Shapes Module extend the one described in CSS2.1? I noticed there has already been a related discussion about this[3], though it seems without clear resolution. Sebastian [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visufx.html#value-def-shape [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-shapes-1-20130620/#ltbasic-shapegt [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0061.html
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 06:42:07 UTC