On 09/04/2013 11:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > That said, I'm not opposed to special-casing flexboxes so that > anonymous flex items take their 'text-overflow' value from the > flexbox. Any more properties that we should do this for? I don't think this special-casing would make sense. IMHO, adding special-case behavior for "text-overflow" would simply be making it slightly easier to get into a use-case that's rife with other footguns. I don't think it's worth the work trying to make that use-case easier, given the problems that will come up as soon as an author tries to insert any inline-level tags. (which will create several anonymous flex items where there was previously one, and confuse the author if they're expecting block-like behavior) ~DanielReceived on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 22:42:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:32 UTC