- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:42:23 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 09/04/2013 11:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > That said, I'm not opposed to special-casing flexboxes so that > anonymous flex items take their 'text-overflow' value from the > flexbox. Any more properties that we should do this for? I don't think this special-casing would make sense. IMHO, adding special-case behavior for "text-overflow" would simply be making it slightly easier to get into a use-case that's rife with other footguns. I don't think it's worth the work trying to make that use-case easier, given the problems that will come up as soon as an author tries to insert any inline-level tags. (which will create several anonymous flex items where there was previously one, and confuse the author if they're expecting block-like behavior) ~Daniel
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 22:42:50 UTC