Re: [css-images][filter-effects] interpolation of filter() to url()/image()

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> Agree. That is why I bring it up. So far we have url() and image() as some kind of "source" functions. What about image-set?

You don't generally have to worry about source functions unless you're
special-casing.  Those are all <image> values, so they'll all work the
same.

> And last but not least cross-fade? filter() to url()/image()/image-set() can be intuitive, but what about the content of cross-fade?

cross-fade() currently only has special behavior against another
cross-fade(), but as our previous discussion talked about, I do plan
to extend the syntax of cross-fade() and let it specially interpolate
against any <image>.  So yeah, we need to figure out the precedence
here.

Without thinking too much about it, I suggest we just let the start
function win.  Let's talk about it on the call if we have time;
otherwise, we'll get to it at the f2f.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 16:19:22 UTC