Re: [css-shapes] how to position <basic-shape>s

On 10/09/2013 11:33 AM, Alan Stearns wrote:
>
> And this would introduce a dissimilarity between how percentages are
> handled on x,y arguments in rectangle() versus how they are handled
> in polygon()

Well, polygon() is a series of points, whereas rectangle() is a size
and a position. So I don't this concern is valid. If you're looking
for a rectangle function that works like polygon(), then you want
rect(): it is two pairs of coordinates defining a rectangle, just
as polygon() is multiple pairs of coordinates defining a polygon.

Does that make sense?

[Still thinking about the rest of your email.]

~fantasai

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 20:47:13 UTC