- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:46:44 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 10/09/2013 11:33 AM, Alan Stearns wrote: > > And this would introduce a dissimilarity between how percentages are > handled on x,y arguments in rectangle() versus how they are handled > in polygon() Well, polygon() is a series of points, whereas rectangle() is a size and a position. So I don't this concern is valid. If you're looking for a rectangle function that works like polygon(), then you want rect(): it is two pairs of coordinates defining a rectangle, just as polygon() is multiple pairs of coordinates defining a polygon. Does that make sense? [Still thinking about the rest of your email.] ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 20:47:13 UTC