- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:59:08 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie <mihnea@adobe.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "cam@mcc.id.au" <cam@mcc.id.au>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > On 10/15/13 10:43 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >>> OK, coming back to this. If we go the Map route, then I'm assuming it's >>>a >>> static, read-only map. Would something like this work? >> >>Is there a particular reason for it to be static? I assume that the >>current spec's interface is live, right? > > The current spec's interface is a static snapshot, based on the feedback > that I get every time I try to define something as live [1]. My current > rule of thumb is to assume something should be static unless there's a > very good reason to make it live. All right, that's fine. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 17:59:55 UTC