W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-regions] Reworking getNamedFlows()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:59:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBMvxc7VhcnTC3Xjwa4bqWy=7jRYX2H8M9zcjbKk=1JUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie <mihnea@adobe.com>, Fran├žois REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "cam@mcc.id.au" <cam@mcc.id.au>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> On 10/15/13 10:43 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> OK, coming back to this. If we go the Map route, then I'm assuming it's
>>> static, read-only map. Would something like this work?
>>Is there a particular reason for it to be static?  I assume that the
>>current spec's interface is live, right?
> The current spec's interface is a static snapshot, based on the feedback
> that I get every time I try to define something as live [1]. My current
> rule of thumb is to assume something should be static unless there's a
> very good reason to make it live.

All right, that's fine.

Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 17:59:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:03 UTC