- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:51:30 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie <mihnea@adobe.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "cam@mcc.id.au" <cam@mcc.id.au>
On 10/15/13 10:43 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> OK, coming back to this. If we go the Map route, then I'm assuming it's >>a >> static, read-only map. Would something like this work? > >Is there a particular reason for it to be static? I assume that the >current spec's interface is live, right? The current spec's interface is a static snapshot, based on the feedback that I get every time I try to define something as live [1]. My current rule of thumb is to assume something should be static unless there's a very good reason to make it live. Thanks, Alan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0327.html
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 17:52:06 UTC