- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:43:46 +0200
- To: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Cc: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, John Mellor <johnme@chromium.org>, "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Hi, >> Considering the CSS >> pixel size recommended by CSS 2.1 and the percentage of arm's length >> where the devices are usually held (around 60-70%), the resulting >> initial containing block width is narrower than for which most sites >> were designed. > > I find the arm length percentage text odd. > > How about: > > The physical size of the screen in combination with the size of the > reference pixel as defined in [css-values-ref-here] results in a > considerably smaller initial containing block than for which most > sites were designed. I think it needs to be more detailed. Most people don't get the relation with arms' length. > How about: > > As a result, many mobile browser vendors use a fixed initial > containing block size that is larger than the viewport. In addition to > scrolling or panning, zooming is often used to change between an > overview of the document and zoom in on particular areas of the > document to read and interact with. OK > Drop "things such as"? > > Drop "universally"? Fine with me. -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆
Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 14:44:13 UTC