- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:25:52 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 9, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 9, 2013, at 10:05 AM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> >>> On 10/01/2013 01:35 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have two drafts with features that refer to an element from the value of a CSS property. They do so with two different >>> mechanisms; I think we should pick one preferred way. >> >> There's also the 'mask-image' property from CSS Masking, >> which uses a select() functional notation. >> >> I think we should figure this all out before putting that >> out as LCWD. :( > > This is on the at-risk list and was a request from the SVG WG. I am fine to move it out to the second level completely. > > Greetings > Dirk I agree that it is better to come up with a general proposal that we accept for all specifications. For this reason I removed select() and child from the first level of CSS Masking. This gives us enough time to discuss element selecting and we don't need to rush it. url(#fragment) for element referencing still needs to be supported for legacy reasons anyway. Greetings, Dirk > >> >> ~fantasai >> >
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 10:26:18 UTC