- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:35:08 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
The 3-value position form (which allows things like "left 20px 50px" as an equivalent to "left 20px top 50px") is barely used, but extremely confusing, and makes it very difficult to use <position> alongside anything else - it's too often grammatically ambiguous. There seems to be at least moderate agreement that this form is a mistake (at least, between me, fantasai, Alan, and Dirk). Would anyone mind if we deprecated it, making it a quirk of background-position, and just define <position> to only have the 1/2/4 value clauses? This would mean that radial-gradient() and object-position, the only other current consumers of <position>, would be affected. I think this is acceptable. Doing this would allow <position> to be mixed with other values more easily, as something like "<position> <length>" is no longer ambiguous. It would also let us define a <3d-position> sanely (compatible with 'transform-origin'). (Well, unfortunately, transform-origin currently allows 1/2/3/4/5 value clauses, where 3/5 are 3d. Sane would be 1/2/3/4/6, with 3/6 being 3d - 3 is just 3 lengths, 6 is 3 keyword+length pairs. The 5-value form suffers from ambiguity again.) ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 00:35:56 UTC