W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-regions] Editorial comment on content chain order

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 17:28:48 -0700
To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, Mihnea-Vlad Ovidenie <mihnea@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
CC: Rossen Atanassov <rossen.atanassov@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <CE79F140.315AA%stearns@adobe.com>
On 7/29/13 10:10 AM, "François REMY" <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:

>> What if instead of the following paragraph:
>> "The children of an element or content with a specified flow may
>> themselves have a specified flow. If an element or content has the same
>> specified flow as one of its ancestors, it becomes the next sibling of
>>its
>> closest ancestor with the same specified flow."
>>
>> we say something like:
>> "The children of an element or content with a specified flow may
>> themselves have a specified flow, in which case they become the next
>> sibling of the latest element or content collected in that flow. In some
>> cases, the child can become the next sibling for one of its ancestors in
>> the same flow".
>
>This is another good solution. 		 	   		

(finally) fixed.

Thanks,

Alan
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 00:29:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:02 UTC