- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:56:59 +0200
- To: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Cc: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
I think it is fine to push that to a level 2. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:23 PM, François REMY > <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >> I don't think this is a good idea. I think one of the main use case of >> @viewport is to be embedded into @media to fallback to a known amount of >> fixed-size layouts even under any real pixel size as viewport, or for slide >> decks this is a way to make sure your content is always rendered under a >> fixed-size resolution and "scaled-to-fit" into the user browser. Documents >> inside an iframe totally want this behavior to continue to work. > > There is no "continue to work" here as this has not been supported by > implementations before AFAIK (meta viewport or prefixed @viewport). > I'm worried about the progression of the spec and the implementations. > So my proposal is to postpone to a level 2. > > -- > Rune Lillesveen > -- Kenneth Rohde Christiansen Web Platform Architect, Intel Corporation. Phone +45 4294 9458 ﹆﹆﹆
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 13:09:26 UTC