W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [css-device-adapt] orientation: descriptor

From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:28:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CANz6XvRsq_3++7ve_sdzS5ayLricPiJtsmhXTP5pHydsedSm8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
<kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
> There seems to be no consensus about whether orientation: is a good
> idea or not, and there is overlap with Screen Orientation spec, which
> additionally introduces values such as portrait-primary,
> landscape-secondary, etc.
> For the above reasons, I think we should drop it from the spec for now
> and we can reintroduce it in a level 2 spec, if people agree that it
> is a good idea.
> Rune, what do you think?

I'm fine with dropping/moving to level 2. In particular since  there's
locking possibilities in Screen Orientation. I have no strong opinions
about declarative vs scripting for that.

Rune Lillesveen
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 11:29:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:02 UTC