- From: Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:28:31 +0200
- To: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > There seems to be no consensus about whether orientation: is a good > idea or not, and there is overlap with Screen Orientation spec, which > additionally introduces values such as portrait-primary, > landscape-secondary, etc. > > For the above reasons, I think we should drop it from the spec for now > and we can reintroduce it in a level 2 spec, if people agree that it > is a good idea. > > Rune, what do you think? I'm fine with dropping/moving to level 2. In particular since there's locking possibilities in Screen Orientation. I have no strong opinions about declarative vs scripting for that. -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 11:29:03 UTC