W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: JavaScript-Driven Accelerated Animations

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:38:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbg5t=vOHv2yZN4V5JJhV_7kdjOaKAL2x+Pt-NKoNoxRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Vollick <vollick@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Ian Vollick <vollick@chromium.org> wrote:

> No, the compositor should never block. All interactions between the proxy
> on the worker and the compositor thread will need to be asynchronous.
>

OK, so the quality of animations produced by this approach will be better
than animations produced by main-thread JS but worse than animations
performed by the compositor directly.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 22:39:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:51:02 UTC