W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2013

Re: JavaScript-Driven Accelerated Animations

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:38:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbg5t=vOHv2yZN4V5JJhV_7kdjOaKAL2x+Pt-NKoNoxRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Vollick <vollick@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Ian Vollick <vollick@chromium.org> wrote:

> No, the compositor should never block. All interactions between the proxy
> on the worker and the compositor thread will need to be asynchronous.

OK, so the quality of animations produced by this approach will be better
than animations produced by main-thread JS but worse than animations
performed by the compositor directly.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 22:39:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:35 UTC