Re: Referring to elements from CSS. (In, but not limited to [css-images-4] and [css-gcpm])

Le 02/10/2013 19:04, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
>> If we have to deal with defining how fragments map to elements anyway, I
>> don’t see a point in keeping ID selectors for this.
>
> This is also acceptable to me.  The reason I suggested it, though, was
> so that the usages in GCPM with attr() would still be valid.  Those
> seem useful!

I’m not sure what you mean here. URLs work nicely with attr(), not ID 
selectors.


>> Unless we want to extend
>> this to more selectors later?
>
> That doesn't seem to be relevant so far - adding the ability to refer
> to use more selectors will require a disambiguating wrapper anyway.
> (Like URLs, the syntax space of Selectors is too large to easily
> mingle with most other things.)
>
> ~TJ
>

-- 
Simon Sapin

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 18:07:13 UTC