- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:04:10 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > If we have to deal with defining how fragments map to elements anyway, I > don’t see a point in keeping ID selectors for this. This is also acceptable to me. The reason I suggested it, though, was so that the usages in GCPM with attr() would still be valid. Those seem useful! > Unless we want to extend > this to more selectors later? That doesn't seem to be relevant so far - adding the ability to refer to use more selectors will require a disambiguating wrapper anyway. (Like URLs, the syntax space of Selectors is too large to easily mingle with most other things.) ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 18:04:57 UTC