W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:23:24 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLYhLT86Q76p5NqripJETPWWmsN_ab3R04AEZ-+4m0nKcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:05 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> I'm a little worried that there might be overlap between the CSS
> property names and the non-CSS-property-name values ('scroll' or
> 'scrolling').  That could be avoided by adding a functional syntax
> around the CSS property names, but that might be overengineering.
>

Yes, I think so.

We could call the scroll value "scroll-position". If we ever add a
"scroll-position" CSS property that doesn't set the actual scroll position,
we deserve what we get.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 01:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC