On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:05 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I'm a little worried that there might be overlap between the CSS > property names and the non-CSS-property-name values ('scroll' or > 'scrolling'). That could be avoided by adding a functional syntax > around the CSS property names, but that might be overengineering. > Yes, I think so. We could call the scroll value "scroll-position". If we ever add a "scroll-position" CSS property that doesn't set the actual scroll position, we deserve what we get. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o wReceived on Saturday, 30 November 2013 01:23:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC