W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:23:24 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLYhLT86Q76p5NqripJETPWWmsN_ab3R04AEZ-+4m0nKcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:05 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> I'm a little worried that there might be overlap between the CSS
> property names and the non-CSS-property-name values ('scroll' or
> 'scrolling').  That could be avoided by adding a functional syntax
> around the CSS property names, but that might be overengineering.

Yes, I think so.

We could call the scroll value "scroll-position". If we ever add a
"scroll-position" CSS property that doesn't set the actual scroll position,
we deserve what we get.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 01:23:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC