W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Proposal: will-animate property

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:22:20 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLatrviULWRcURSH-PPOO5KhJAqT4eZUaK39NKEkKAEW=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, Matt Woodrow <matt@mozilla.com>, Cameron McCormack <cmccormack@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> I would simply say that will-animate values other than "none" always
> induce a stacking context.
>

Sorry, I mean "auto". (We might want to add a "none" value later to disable
UA heuristics for detecting and optimizing for animation, but that's future
work.)

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2013 01:22:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:37 UTC