- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:20:08 -0800
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > I have another leader issue. Currently, the spec presecribes > multi-line leaders in certain cases. One of the examples has this > rendering: > > Douglas Adams... > ..............42 > > The normative text is: > > If the presence of a minimum length leader at the end of a line > results in subsequent content being moved to the next line, the > leader will also appear at the beginning of the next line. > > http://books.spec.whatwg.org/#leaders > > However, I'm unsure if multi-line leaders should be prescribed. Do > multi-line leders exist in any typographical tradition? Samplings from > three semi-random publications indicate that leaders only appear on > a single line: > > http://www.wiumlie.no/2013/whatwg/books/1.png > http://www.wiumlie.no/2013/whatwg/books/2.png > http://www.wiumlie.no/2013/whatwg/books/3.png > > If we decide that multi-line leaders should not be supported, one quick > fix is probably to say: > > If the presence of a minimum length leader at the end of a line > results in subsequent content being moved to the next line, the > leader will only appear at the beginning of the next line. > > Which should result in this rendering: > > Douglas Adams > ..............42 > > which may not be right either; none of the examples have a leader at > the start of a line. An alternative may be: > > Douglas > Adams.........42 > > But I'm unsure if it looks better. > > Feedback welcome. Yeah, none of your examples end up with something *just* long enough that it doesn't fit on the same line as the number. They're either substantially longer, so they naturally wrap, or are purposely broken earlier. I do think I prefer having one thing wrap down to the next line. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 19:20:59 UTC