Re: [css3-background] box-shadow spread rounding

On 11/15/2013 10:58 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
> Hyperbolic seems to violate the requirements - it only approaches
> (1,1) asymptotically.  (And for the Box.constant value you're using on
> the page, it doesn't even really get close - it ends at (1, .8).
> Using a constant of 4 seems to do better - it at least hits .91.)
>
> Of the presented choices, I like both Arc and Cubic equally.  I'll
> defer to your judgement and agree with Cubic, then.

We chose cubic because it has better behavior close to zero --
arc leaves zero too abruptly.

~fantasai

Received on Sunday, 17 November 2013 04:51:54 UTC