Re: [mediaqueries] Intentional that "not" is only usable in front of a media type?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:57:26 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>> If I am, does anyone have any clue why this grammar restriction
>>>> exists?  It seems more reasonable to let it apply to media features
>>>> without a media type as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to relax these restrictions and make the media queries
>>> grammar a lot more like the @supports condition grammar.  I think
>>> there were others in favor the last time I brought that up.
>>>
>>> (I'm hoping it's one of the big things on the table for the next
>>> level of media queries, along with refactoring the characteristics
>>> of media types into media queries and pretty much deprecating the
>>> types.)
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I am down with this.  MQ4 right now deprecates all but
>> all/screen/print.  (I was working on it this weekend.)
>
> I fully agree with deprecating media types, but shouldn't we keep speech as
> well?

Maybe!

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 20:15:34 UTC