Re: [mediaqueries] Intentional that "not" is only usable in front of a media type?

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:57:26 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

>>> If I am, does anyone have any clue why this grammar restriction
>>> exists?  It seems more reasonable to let it apply to media features
>>> without a media type as well.
>>
>> I'd like to relax these restrictions and make the media queries
>> grammar a lot more like the @supports condition grammar.  I think
>> there were others in favor the last time I brought that up.
>>
>> (I'm hoping it's one of the big things on the table for the next
>> level of media queries, along with refactoring the characteristics
>> of media types into media queries and pretty much deprecating the
>> types.)
>
> Yeah, I am down with this.  MQ4 right now deprecates all but
> all/screen/print.  (I was working on it this weekend.)

I fully agree with deprecating media types, but shouldn't we keep speech  
as well?

  - Florian

Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 20:09:10 UTC