Re: [css-counter-styles] implementation of complex cjk counter styles

You may want to check the reference tests I wrote for my implementation.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw> wrote:
> I'll forward this to HTML 5 IG. To understand if any difference in zh-TW and zh-CN. Any feedback will forward here.
>
> WANDERER Bobby Tung
> Sent from my iPhone 5.
>
>> Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> 於 2013/11/11 下午8:09 寫道：
>>
>> I'm forwarding information from Bobby; looks like it matches to Xidorn's
>> feedback for Chinese.
>>
>> /koji
>>
>>
>> From: 董福興 <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
>> Date: Monday, November 11, 2013 3:55 PM
>> To: "Ishii, Koji a | Koji | BLD" <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
>> Subject: Re: [css-counter-styles] Suggested changes to Chinese and Korean
>> informal styles
>>
>>
>> Can I count informal styles as verbal expression?
>>
>> here is the list. please help me to forward. I've read #CSS discussion.
>>
>> 1
>> 一
>>
>> 10
>> 十
>> (end zero is skipped)
>>
>> 11
>> 十|一
>>
>> 100
>> 一百
>> (end two zero is skipped)
>>
>> 101
>> 一百|零|一
>>
>> 110
>> 一百|一
>> (end zero is skipped,一 is instead of 十)
>>
>> 111
>> 一百|一十|一
>>
>> 1000
>> 一千
>> (end three zero is skipped)
>>
>> 1001
>> 一千|零|一
>> (two zero is combined as one zero)
>>
>> 1010
>> 一千|零|一十|
>> (end zero is skipped)
>>
>> 1011
>> 一千|零|一十|一
>>
>> 1100
>> 一千|一
>> (end two zero is skipped, 一 is instead of 一百)
>>
>> 1101
>> 一千|一百|零|一
>>
>> 1110
>> 一千|一百|一十
>> (end zero is skipped)
>>
>> 1111
>> 一千|一百|一十|一
>>
>> 10000
>> 一萬
>> (end four zero is skipped)
>>
>>
>> 10001
>> 一萬|零|一
>> (Three zero is combined)
>>
>> 10010
>> 一萬|零|一十|
>> (two zero is combined, final end is skipped)
>>
>> 10011
>> 一萬|零|一十|一
>> (two zero is combined)
>>
>> 10100
>> 一萬|零|一百
>> (end two zero is skipped)
>>
>>
>> 10101
>> 一萬|零|一百|零|一
>>
>> 10110
>> 一萬|零|一百|一十
>> (end zero is skipped)
>>
>> 10111
>> 一萬|零|一百|一十|一
>>
>> 11000
>> 一萬|一
>> (end three zero is skipped, 一 is instead of 一千)
>>
>>
>> 11001
>> 一萬|一千|零|一
>> (two zero is combined)
>>
>>
>> 11100
>> 一萬|一千|一
>> (end two zero is skipped, 一 is instead of 一百)
>>
>>
>> 11101
>> 一萬|一千|一百|零|一
>>
>> 11110
>> 一萬|一千|一百|一十|
>> (end zero is skipped, 一 is instead of 一十)
>>
>>
>> 11111
>> 一萬|一千|一百|一十|一
>>
>>
>> Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp> 於 2013/11/11 下午3:17 寫道：
>>
>>
>> Bobby, we need Chinese experts on issue #11 on this:
>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/issues-lc-20130718.html#issue-11
>>
>> Do you have any insights?
>>
>> /koji
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/7/13 11:13 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I just submitted an implementation of longhand East Asian counter
>>>> styles for
>>>> Firefox. You can find it at
>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934072 .
>>>>
>>>> As described in comment 8 in the page mentioned above, this impl
>>>> generates a
>>>> slightly different result with the current draft: for 11,111, it
>>>> generates
>>>> "一万千百十一" in japanese-informal and "萬 千百十一" in korean-hanja-informal;
>>>> and it
>>>> generates "一千万" for 10,000,000 in japanese-informal. These
>>>> modifications are
>>>> based on the discussion in this mailing list and replies from some of my
>>>> native friends, and I also referred to the result of Google Translate.
>>>
>>> Can you please describe what these changes are in terms of the
>>> algorithms in the spec?
>>
>> And here's more of Xidorn's feedback, on the Chinese informal styles:
>>
>>> Section 7.2.1, 5. Drop ones, the first term should be changed from
>>>
>>>> For the Chinese informal styles, for any group with a value between ten
>>>> and nineteen,
>>>> remove the tens digit (leave the digit marker).
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>> For the Chinese informal styles, for any group **other than the ones
>>>> group** with a
>>>> value between ten and nineteen, remove the tens digit (leave the digit
>>>> marker).
>>>
>>> For example, for number 10,011, the current term generates "一万零十一" and
>>> the new term generates "一万零一十一" which is more preferable. The number
>>> of result Google search can prove: 8 results for "一万零十一", but about
>>> 741,000 results for "一万零一十一".
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> ~TJ
>>
>>