- From: <rune@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:59:48 +0000
- To: John Mellor <johnme@chromium.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Alexandre Elias <aelias@chromium.org>
Quoting Rune Lillesveen <rune@opera.com>: > On Wed, 29 May 2013 13:02:41 +0200, John Mellor <johnme@chromium.org> wrote: > >> So I support removing device-width/height from @viewport, but I >> would go further, and when translating meta viewport, I >would map >> width=device-width onto a width:auto @viewport (assuming >> width:auto means window width - i.e. I'd want >> >"width=device-width" on its own to behave the same as "zoom:1"). > > I'm assuming that "height=device-height" or "width=device-height" have > not been significantly used in the wild, so that should be fine, not > causing interoperability issues. Yes, width:auto means window width > (unless there's a non-auto height which yields a width based on height > and aspect ratio). So yes, I'm fine with that change too. While drafting this, I figured out device-width/height would be translated into '100%' instead of 'auto' since 'auto' would be affected by the value in the other dimension. Minor detail: width=device-height will now be the same as width=device-width. Not that I think anyone would have used the former consciously. -- Rune Lillesveen
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 10:00:26 UTC