- From: ACJ <ego@acjs.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 20:02:59 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51A4F153.1080609@acjs.net>
Op 28-5-2013 19:48, irfan mir schreef: > Okay, I understand now. Thank you for the explanation. This really > cleared things up. > > 1vh = 1% of html, body's height and 1vw = 1% of html, body's width. > > And they let one use the units as relative the percentage of the html, > body height and width instead of relative to the parent height and width. Well, technically, 1% of the the viewport's height and width, respectively. This is not necessarily the same as the computed dimensions of the body and/or html elements. Sincerely, ACJ > > > On 28 May 2013 08:59, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com > <mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:28 AM, irfan mir <theirf@gmail.com > <mailto:theirf@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I just learned about the vh and vw units and see how it would be > very > > helpful in terms of typography. > > > > But in terms of using it as a unit for dimensions, what > differentiates vh > > for height and vw for width from percent? > > Don't a 100 of all 3 take up the entire viewport? > > As Henrik said, percentages are only equal to vw/vh on the html/body > elements, and on other elements if *every ancestor was 100% > width/height as well*. > > That's obviously rarely true, so vw/vh let you use the viewport size > deeper into your page structure. > > It also works for things where percentages are interpreted > differently, like font-size (where they're relative to the parent's > font-size). > > ~TJ > > > > > -- > Regards, > Irfan Mir.
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 18:03:26 UTC