- From: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 14:20:33 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
A '::distributed' functional pseudo element in blink now suports a relative selector. https://codereview.chromium.org/15657003/ So far, the spec is good. I've not found any issue in the spec when I was implementing that. As for other use cases of relative selectors, such as Selectors API level 2, I'd like to implement that too. But I am not sure how stable the spec is. Is there any opinions? On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Edits done! Please take a look and let us know if we got it right~ >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#relative > > To be specific, Shadow DOM should specify that ::distributed() takes a > relative selector, and the reference element set is the virtual > container that holds the distributed items. > > ~TJ > -- Hayato
Received on Monday, 27 May 2013 05:21:28 UTC