Re: ::distributed and relative selectors (Was Re: [shadowdom]: Using :root to specify the insertion point in ::distributed)

A '::distributed' functional pseudo element in blink now suports a
relative selector.

So far, the spec is good. I've not found any issue in the spec when I
was implementing that.

As for other use cases of relative selectors, such as Selectors API
level 2, I'd like to implement that too. But I am not sure how stable
the spec is.
Is there any opinions?

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <> wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:24 PM, fantasai <> wrote:
>> Edits done! Please take a look and let us know if we got it right~
> To be specific, Shadow DOM should specify that ::distributed() takes a
> relative selector, and the reference element set is the virtual
> container that holds the distributed items.
> ~TJ


Received on Monday, 27 May 2013 05:21:28 UTC