- From: Christopher Palmer (BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN) <cpalmer18@bloomberg.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 16:03:15 -0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <519F8F42020F01920119005C_0_397106@n281>
Does it make sense to additionally allow the user control on the type of smooth scrolling they want? Something like smooth-linear, smooth-ease-in-out, etc? This seems a lot like a standard transition, and I would assume users would want the same types of controls over it. Specifying duration also comes to mind. > Resent-From: www-style@w3.org > From: "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com> > Date: May 24, 2013, 9:48:29 AM EDT > To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> > Cc: "Nat Duca" <nduca@google.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>, "James Simonsen" <simonjam@chromium.org>, "Tony Gentilcore" <tonyg@google.com>, "Tom Wiltzius" <wiltzius@google.com> > Subject: Re: [cssom-view] Add a "smooth" parameter to scrollTo and scrollBy functions > > On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:04:40 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >>> At this point I think we should both introduce a CSS property that enables >>> smooth scrolling and also support smooth scrolling with scroll() and >>> scrollIntoView(). >> >> Your arguments seem convincing to me. +1 > > Done. > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/009ff568218a > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/1fce354eb139 > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Attachments
- text/html attachment: alt_body.html
Received on Friday, 24 May 2013 16:42:41 UTC