- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:14:29 -0700
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/20/13 11:56 AM, "John Hudson" <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: >On 20/05/13 10:42 AM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote: > >>>> # User agents that apply platform font aliasing rules to >>>> # font family names defined via @font-face rules are >>>> # considered non-conformant. > >>>> >>I have no idea what "platform font aliasing rules" means. > >> Isn't there a setting in operating systems where an user can disable or >> enable (and even customize: eg >> >>http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kde-workspace/kcontrol/fonts/index.htm >>l#fonts-aa >> ) font aliasing ? I would think this is what platform font aliasing >>rules >> would mean. > > >ALERT > >I think a different meaning of 'aliasing' is being used in this context, >and Gérard's response indicates ample room for confusion. The CSS Fonts >Module uses the term 'alias' in the context of font matching, e.g. > > Create an alias for local Japanese fonts on > different platforms > >But the gerund aliasing has a specific technical meaning in the context >of vector rasterisation and, hence, display of scalable outline fonts. >This is what Gérard refers to. > >Perhaps it would be a good idea to come up with some different terms >than 'alias' and, especially, 'aliasing' in the sense that the CSS Fonts >Module is currently using the term? > > >JH > > >PS. On the subject of aliasing in the sense that Gérard understood the >term, I would, these days, equate 'platform' with particular display >engines rather than operating systems. > Windows calls this 'font substitution'; and it really is a font name substitution.
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 20:15:31 UTC