- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:18:59 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/15/13 5:10 PM, "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > If I've already selected the region to give it 'flow-into' why would >anyone NOT prefer this for the first line of the fragment rules: > > @region flowname { > >instead of this for mixing selectors into one line: > > .select the #region box.again::region(write.a #single fragment >.selector.all on::one_line:here) { > >Even the fact that you can more easily visually associate the nested >rules with the flow name is a huge advantage for @region. I'm not following your use of @region above. You don't use the flow name in the old @region rule, you use the selector for the region. So for your example, it would have been: @region .select the #region box.again { write.a #single fragment .selector.all on::one_line:here { /* declarations */ } } Thanks, Alan
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 00:19:29 UTC