- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:57:59 -0400
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> From: John Daggett [mailto:jdaggett@mozilla.com] > Right sloping in the glyph design coordinate system. In other words, the synthesized > glyphs are sheared right in the glyph design coordinate system, then laid out (either rotated > 90 right or upright). > > In visual terms, I'm proposing (1) and I *think* you're proposing (2) in the illustration > below: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013May/att-0027/synthetic-italics-tategaki.png I understand your opinion, thank you for explaining in this detail. > Your proposal introduces an inconsistency when 'text-orientation: > upright' is used, real italics and synthetic italics will differ in how they display, one will slant > right, the other down. Case (3) in the illustration above results from setting 'font-family: > Arial', the real italic face of Arial is used but for the Japanese text the italics are > synthesized. Good point, I missed this case, and I agree this is an issue for (2). > But as everyone is saying, there really isn't a use case for vertical italic Japanese text runs The use is less common, but use case does exist. "Less common" is not equal to "there really isn't a use case." It's used in Harry Potter. It's used in several books in light-novel style[2]. > and proposal (2) *does* introduce an inconsistency into vertical runs of Latin italics, the > synthesized italics will differ from real italics. I agree on this point. But issues of your proposal are listed in my blog post[1]; there are much more common and severe issues. Upright non-full-width Latin characters in Italic are really rare. Your proposal breaks dashes in simple Latin text in sideways. You need to create a list of common code points not to slant. Don't you agree, if we chose the least problematic case, it'd be (2)? [1] http://koji.ec/archives/32 [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_novel /koji
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 15:58:30 UTC