- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:17:37 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 01/16/2013 07:41 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote: > I often see the following CSS code, I think this has a problem: > > p { > letter-spacing: 0pt; > word-spacing: 0pt; > text-align: justify; > } > > In the CSS2.1 and CSS3 Text, the initial value of letter/word-spacing is > 'normal', stretchable in justification, and different from the fixed > value 0pt. [...] > > My questions: > - Is my understanding of the spec correct?--If the value of letter/word-spacing > is '0pt', the <spacing-limits> is optimum=minimum=maximum=0pt and cannot be > stretched in text justification. > > - I tested major browsers with the following samples and found that they > stretch the fixed value spacing, the value '0pt' is treated like 'normal'. > Is this behavior wrong and should be corrected? (or the CSS spec is wrong?) Your understanding of the spec is correct, but Koji and I think that the spec will need to be changed here. Our proposal... Part I: letter-spacing: <length> allows justification This solves backwards-compatibility with such style sheets as you mention, and is also consistent with implementations. It is also consistent with how 'word-spacing' behaves: <length> values there allow justification. (Note: This would be a change from CSS2.1, so will need to be backported.) Part II: Add 'fixed' keyword to disallow justification We have a problem if we allow justification for letter-spacing always; German typesetting rules requires that it not be allowed! So here is a proposal -- letter-spacing: normal | <length> || fixed If 'fixed' keyword is specified, then justification cannot alter letter-spacing, only word-spacing. I think Part I is important to take. I am open to other suggestions to solve the use case in Part II... ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 11 May 2013 02:18:05 UTC