W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 19:50:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZvMxfavHyCG--PGj2gU4XRWYbG=pUM39_JEjv-G7LMzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, Jon Rimmer <jon.rimmer@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:

> If we don’t want the spinner to finish fading out until the expensive real
> content can be faded in, we’d have to guess how long the expensive content
> will take to paint, and use that guess when determining the duration of the
> spinner fade-out.
>

So this is a different use-case to the one Tab originally described?


> Also, rAF-driven animations would still stall while the expensive content
> is being painted.
>

I'm not suggesting a rAF-driven animation, just a rAF-triggered animation.

>
Rob
-- 
q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq
qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq
qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq
qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q
qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq
qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 02:50:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:29 UTC