- From: Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 23:06:03 +0300
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Šime Vidas <sime.vidas@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
I think having two functions for very similar functionality (absolute vs relative adjustment) is a bit clumsy and inelegant. Apart from that, great idea! Not sure adjusting RGB channels is useful, but adjusting HSL channels is super useful. Lea Verou W3C developer relations http://w3.org/people/all#lea ✿ http://lea.verou.me ✿ @leaverou On May 8, 2013, at 18:17, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Sebastian Zartner > <sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote: >> Since different kinds of color values are involved in these examples, using >> rgba() doesn't make sense here. alpha() seems more logical to me. > > Agreed. I'm thinking maybe a pair of functions for each component, > set-*() and adjust-*(), for either overriding the given channel or > adjusting it up or down. Hmm, though, there's argument for both > adjusting by a set amount, and by a percentage amount, at least for > some channels. I'll look into what the preprocessors do, precisely. > > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 20:06:13 UTC