- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 07:43:16 -0700
- To: Niels Matthijs <niels.matthijs@internetarchitects.be>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Niels Matthijs <niels.matthijs@internetarchitects.be> wrote: > I know the difference between display:inline and display:inline-block, but I > was wondering if there’s a good reason why someone would prefer inline over > inline-block? The only reason that I can think of is if you want to > hard-block top/bottom paddings/margins, but are there any other things that > display:inline can handle which inline-block can’t? > > Or put differently, is there still a use-case for applying display:inline > instead of inline-block (taking browser support out of the equation). I suggest you try setting "span, i, b, u, em, strong, mark {display: inline-block;}" and see how long that lasts on a real site. ^_^ The moment one of those elements starts near the end of a line and wants to continue to the next line, it'll be obvious. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 14:44:06 UTC