- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 11:17:59 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > I would like to split the current contents of CSS Exclusions and Shapes > into at least two documents: > > CSS Exclusions > (wrap-flow and wrap-through) > This would contain only the current section 3, and define how exclusions > work without reference to shapes. > > CSS Shapes > (shape values and shape-outside on floats) > This would contain most of section 4, include all the methods for > specifying shapes, and define shape-outside on floats. > > Extra bits > (shape-inside, shape-outside on exclusions) > Since shape-inside depends on the exclusions processing model, this and > using shape-outside on exclusions would be deferred to some later document > that could depend on both of the above. It would probably turn into the > next level of CSS Shapes, but might just live on a wiki page until we're > ready for that. > > Exclusions and Shapes are both useful on their own, and hopefully breaking > these two apart will make both smaller pieces more feasible to consider > implementing. I think this is a good idea in general. Why do you say that shape-inside depends on the exclusion processing model? It's described in those terms right now, but I don't see why it requires such, any more than shape-outside does. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2013 18:18:46 UTC