- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:53:12 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
A while ago, I raised some concerns about how overflow, overflow-style, overflow-x and overflow-y work, in particular when considering which of these should be used to introduce page generation on overflow and box generation on overflow. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/1197.html As we now have a spec talking about, and extending, overflow, I think this discussion is worth having. With regards to the publication of the spec as first public working draft, I would like to have an issue marked somewhere in the spec about this. Something like: "There are discussions [link to my mail] about how overflow, overflow-style, overflow-x and overflow-y should work and interact with each other. Until consensus on this topic is reached, it is not completely clear which of these should be used for paged-x | paged-y | paged-x-controls | paged-y-controls | fragments" It kind of overlaps with issue 7 and 19, but I would appreciate having it spelled out explicitly, so that we don't forget to have this discussion, which I believe is worth having. Other than this, all the issues I can currently think of are already captured in the spec, so I am in favor of publishing. - Florian
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 16:53:40 UTC