- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:34:23 +1300
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:34:51 UTC
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>wrote: > >> The current algorithm never makes the boxes overlap, if widths are 'auto': >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css3-page-20130314/#variable-sizing > > > If B is the width of the page area, then it must overlap A or C right? > I mean, even if B's box doesn't technically overlap A or C, the contents of B and the contents of A or C will overlap. From the author's/user's point of view there's no difference. Rob -- Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:34:51 UTC