- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:30:27 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote: > The spec for the 'transform' property says: > >> Any value other than ‘none’ for the transform results in the creation >> of both a stacking context and a containing block. The object acts as >> a containing block for fixed positioned descendants. > > What about absolutely positioned descendants? Are their containing block > still the nearest positioned ancestor, or is it the nearest ancestor that is > either positioned or transformed? It's a containing block, so yes. That last line is specifying something additional, not limiting the previous clause. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2013 21:31:14 UTC