- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:20:17 +0100
- To: "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:03:48 +0100, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > Florian, all, > > How do I progress this issue ? Do I need to file a bug ? (where?) Do I > need to join the WG ? Leaving your other two issues aside for the moment, and focusing on the mutichannel part. There is no need to join the WG, raising the issue in this mailing list and following up on conversations (as you are doing) is normally enough. Once we reach sufficient consensus, or at least understand well enough the questions that needs to be answered, we can take it to one of our weekly conference calls to try and decide one way or the other. From where I stand, I see a few open questions with your proposal: * Should it be number of channels, or number of speakers? To answer this questions, we would need a variety of use cases to be described, to be able to judge which one fits best. * If number of speakers, can that be reliably detected? I am not an expert on the topic, but it seems to be that the OS (let alone the browser) is not necessarily aware of how many physical speakers there are. * It seems to me that your main use case for this media query would not actually be applying different styles based on the situation, but feed that back into javascript, and use it there. If that's the case, I wonder if media queries is the best tool to solve the problem. - Florian
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2013 13:20:41 UTC