- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:01:39 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
The Selectors spec talks about the "document tree", e.g. "The elements of a document tree that are represented by a selector are the subjects of the selector." [1] The definition of this term in CSS 2.1 [2] states that it is a "tree of elements" and that "[e]ach element in this tree has exactly one parent, with the exception of the root element, which has none." But for the root pseudo-class [3] it is said "The :root pseudo-class represents an element that is the root of the document. In HTML 4, this is always the HTML element." There seems to be an inconsistency here if one considers HTML document fragments and HTML elements that are not in a document. I'm assuming that such trees are still "document trees" in the CSS sense even though they aren't rooted at a Document node in the DOM, since there is still a "tree of elements". In such cases, it seems CSS2 implies that the top-most element (DOM-wise, having a DocumentFragment parentNode or a null parentNode) is the "root element" in CSS terms, yet it isn't necessarily "the HTML element", which css3-selectors claims to be the case. (See also [4] and thread starting at [5]) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#selector-syntax [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#doctree [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#root-pseudo [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jun/0116.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0290.html -- Øyvind Stenhaug Opera Software ASA
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 14:02:12 UTC