- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:28:45 -0400
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Nat Duca <nduca@google.com>, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, Tom Wiltzius <wiltzius@google.com>
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 22:30 +0100, Simon Pieters wrote: > Is there no desire to control how long it should take to scroll? Is there > no desire to control the timing function (ease/linear/etc)? The less variation of that sort of thing there across Web sites, the better for the user. In addition, the wonderful thing about having smooth scrolling in CSS is that I might be able to turn it off! I might have liked it when I was 20, but now I can't focus fast enough to control it. A "page up/down" that scolls by a screen-ful minus one line and highlights the overlapping line (e.g. with a horizontal rule) was the easiest interface I've used. I think I first saw that on the ICL Perq. Again, one really wants consistency across Web sites there. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 01:28:52 UTC