- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:54:15 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/17/13 1:05 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >> Would the auto-placement algorithm take order into account in any way? > >Yes; the auto-placement algorithm is the main reason for applying >'order' at all. Right, I should have asked whether including order in grid layout would change the relationship between steps 1 and 4 in the current algorithm. And the answer is no, it only affects step 4 by itself. > >> Say >> I have three grid items in a 3x3 grid, and each is small enough to fit >>in >> any grid cell. I give them order values of 1, 2 and 3. These would >> auto-place in the top three cells of the grid. Now I take the 'order:2' >> grid item and place it in the center cell. I might expect the 'order:3' >>to >> land in the middle-right grid cell. As I understand the current >>algorithm >> it would actually place the 'order:3' item in the top-middle cell, which >> isn't exactly "ordered" in the way that's been specified. > >In general, auto-placed items always flow into the empty spaces in >order, regardless of where in document order they fall relative to >manually-placed items. I don't think it'll be too confusing to >authors here, once they get used to auto-placement in general. So since auto-placed items don't respect document order with regard to manually placed items, you're assuming it will be clear that auto-placed items won't respect a specified order with regard to manually placed items. I think that's reasonable but not necessarily obvious. Is the effect on z-order also split between manual- and auto-placed items? Or can the interleaving between manual and auto-placed item overlap be controlled by the order values? Thanks, Alan
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2013 20:55:00 UTC