- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:39:40 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/8/13 1:31 PM, "Alan Stearns" <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: >On 1/30/13 2:55 PM, "Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > >>Bert Bos wrote, on 29 Nov 2012: >> >> > > As I mentioned last week, I've edited the sample code in Appendix A >> > > [1] in CSS Regions to move the regions elements to a separate file >> > > using custom elements from Web Components [2]. >> > > >> > > Bert, Håkon - does this approach satisfy your requirement for >> > > separating content markup from layout? >> > >> > I think it can work. >> >>Certainly, it's much better than having empty elements in HTML files. >> (snip) > >I intend to re-work the example to move the <style> block to the >x-fancy-layout.html file. I think this is much more straightforward and >allows for better fallback - if the external file does not load or custom >elements are not supported, the content flows above the image as if the >'is' attribute did not exist. I have made this change to Appendix A and switched all of the example code in the css3-regions draft to use HTML Templates [1] to separate content markup from layout. I also added a note (currently note 2) describing this use and linking to the various web components specs. Please take a look at the changes. I believe this satisfies the concerns behind issue 16858 [2] about (a) keeping content separate from layout and (b) using good practices in spec examples. Thanks, Alan [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16858
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 21:40:11 UTC