- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:18:42 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
When inner table elements (elements with display table-row-group, table-header-group, table-footer-group, table-row, table-column, table-column-group, and table-cell) are relatively positioned, CSS 2.1 does not specify what happens to their borders and backgrounds. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#table-layers should specify what happens to backgrounds when inner table elements are relatively positioned. For example, if a table row is relatively positioned, does a background image that comes from the row group move? http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#separated-borders should perhaps explicitly specify what happens to borders in the separated borders model when relative positioning is used, though I believe it can be derived from the current spec. (The border on the table should not move; the borders on cells should move in response to relative positioning of a cell, row, or row/header/footer-group.) http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#collapsing-borders should specify what happens to collapsed borders when relative positioning is used on inner table elements. My preference is for none of the borders to move. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 02:19:05 UTC