- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:18:16 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Grid layout uses non-standard (for the rest of CSS) approach: percentage calculation there happens against imaginary box established by grid lines so auto width/height of the grid itself is not dependent of percentage calculations on its children strictly speaking. But even in grid case I am not sure actually what should happen with rows having min-content height when their children have height:120% in some cell. What would be the computed row height? -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Right now, Flexbox treats vertical percentage margins and paddings > same as block layout - they're resolved relative to the width of the > containing block. Grid instead makes vertical margin/padding resolve > their percentages against the height of the containing block. > > I think this is a reasonable behavior, and would like to copy it into > Flexbox. (In general, I'd like Grid and Flexbox to be identical in > these kinds of details unless there's a great reason for the > difference.) > > Thoughts? > > ~TJ and fantasai >
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 01:18:44 UTC