- From: Julien Chaffraix <julien.chaffraix@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:55:45 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
>> I have read the grid layout module and I think that it is very good, but >> there is one thing that bothers me. >> >> It is about the automatic grid placement. I think that it has a problem >> with spanned grid items. Namely, it leaves holes of unused space in the >> grid in some situations. > > I strongly agree that dense packing is useful, but it has some > downsides as well: > * it has worse performance (n^2 rather than n, though most of the time > the n will be small) > * it can sometimes be confusing, as elements late in document order > can appear before elements much earlier than them in document order, > if they're the first thing to fit in that hole (but most of the time, > holes will be filled pretty quickly) Under the current algorithm this is even *worse* from that perspective as the cursor will be overriden if you encounter a grid item with a non-auto minor axis and auto major axis. I still think it will yield to confusion among authors when the cursor will jump around due to the previous override. I can't think of a way the document order will not influence the placement - placing item N depends on where you placed all the previous items - so it's probably not such a big issue. > Because of this, I suggest a switch on the grid-auto-flow property > that controls whether the packing is dense or loose. > > Note that WebKit's implementation accidentally implemented dense > packing already. ^_^ (It showed up in Chrome Canary a few days ago, > if you want to check.) FWIW, I assumed that grid auto placement should be dense, which is why WebKit is doing that. I also send my feedbacks on the algorithm some time ago [1] and assumed the algorithm in the specification was wrong with not resetting the cursor (for the jumping issue I mentioned above). Julien [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0468.html
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 21:56:35 UTC