- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 02:42:51 +0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(13/02/15 6:25), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > After a lot of feedback, I think we should revert min-width's initial > value back to 0. So great to see you raise this and I am so excited to know that no one has any objection to this yet! > One of my coworkers has been using Flexbox for quite a while to build > internal analytics displays, and nearly all of the problems he has > with Flexbox end up being that he needs to apply a min-*: 0 somewhere. Last November when I was giving an intro to css3-flex before folks start writing tests for the TTWF at Beijing, I talked about this in one of my slides[1] and with that slide I told people that if you don't do 'min-width: 0' you are gonna let random jerks break your site by inserting content with enough 'min-content' size (feel free to play with this in [1]). At that time I wasn't sure this argument would be convincing enough to change this as this is at CR already and I thought I could collect some testimonial from Web developers but I never do so. It might still be interesting to investigate how many times this 'min-content: auto' behavior have tripped developers up when they use 'display: table-cell' as a solution for equal-height-column-layout too. Anyway, congratulations and many thanks for raising this! If this isn't raised then this would really become something as notorious and widely-criticized as the length of "querySelector"! [1] http://dev.oupeng.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/20121020-kennyluck-flex-layout.html#min-width-auto-continued Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 18:43:19 UTC