- From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:18:07 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. skriver: > Recent discussion between me, fantasai, and some internal people over > the 'display-box' property > <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-display-3/#the-display-box> have led us > to conclude that it needs to be a completely separate property, not a > longhand of 'display'. (Reasoning below.) However, now we need a > name. We've come up with "box", "show", and "box-tree". Better > suggestions? > > Rationale: > Currently the Display module makes "none"-ness a sub-property of > 'display'. This does what we want (gives us an independent switch for > whether or not the box is shown, separate from box type), but this has > some problems: > > * To set the box type safely, you need to always set two properties, > 'display-inside' and 'display-outside', so as to avoid accidentally > clobbering the "none"-ness value. > * Currently, authors use 'display' to set the box type, which means > that UA-stylesheet use of the "none"-ness value will get clobbered > unless everyone rewrites their pages (which won't happen). Another motivation is that it is simpler for scripting to toggle a separate property than to remember what the old value was of the property.
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 22:18:40 UTC