- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:54:23 +0100
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- CC: Julian Viereck <julian.viereck@googlemail.com>, www-style@w3.org, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Le 05/03/2013 05:13, Robert O'Callahan a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org > <mailto:simon.sapin@exyr.org>> wrote: > > We discussed css3-page at the last f2f meeting, and the Working > Group agrees that we want to do much more than is possible with the > current draft. > > However this draft has been around and kind of stable for a long > time, so the plan is to publish css3-page Soon® without much more > features than it currently has, and start in parallel with css3-page. > > > Speaking for myself, and Julian I think, the current css3-page > margin-box model feels both over-complicated and inadequate, which isn't > a good combination, and I don't think we want to implement it in Gecko. > We'd rather bypass it and do something better, perhaps along the lines > of Julian's proposal. (I meant start in parallel with Paged Media **Level 4**, of course.) Daniel Glazman is currently sketching out ideas for css4-page, which I believe will include a way to flow content from HTML elements into headers and footers, as in Julian’s proposal. I suggest discussing this again when Daniel brings his proposal to the WG, but I still hope tho two models can be unified. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 06:54:54 UTC