- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:15:59 -0800
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Cc: Nicolas Robidoux <nicolas.robidoux@gmail.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Nicolas Robidoux > <nicolas.robidoux@gmail.com> wrote: >> 1) It would appear that regardless of whether the gradient is >>computed<< >> in pre- or non-pre, the >>specification<< of the starting, ending and stop >> colors should be in non-pre. > > yes, that is the case. Colors are always specified in non-premultiplied. Yeah. We could theoretically add more color functions that specify premultiplied, but I doubt they'd be useful, and they'd be very likely to confuse people. ^_^ >> 2) Maybe there should be some way to specify whether the gradient should >> be computed in linear light, in perceptual light, or taking the current >> color space as is. > > yes. It would be nice if we could specify that gradients are interpolated in > an Lab (or other non-sRGB) colorspace. Yeah, thinking about that for the future. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 19:16:46 UTC